Lie 20: Men have Landed on the Moon

Yah right. How stupid do they think we are?

Chris Weigl

Oct 04, 2025

Image posted by Twitter user Khalid Al Zarooni@Khalidalzarouni

Sorry. Not buying it. Stanley Kubrick filmed the whole thing.

Ask yourself: How come we can’t go there now? Why?

Who the hell filmed the spaceship leaving the moon? Did they leave the camera man behind?

How come the space ship did not burn from the radiation? I thought the reason we could not go there was because of the radiation.

How come NASA lost the film footage? Where did it go?

Does it have anything to do with trying to beat Russia to the moon? Was the aim of the mission to fool the Soviets?

Why did NASA’s highest ranking official, James Webb, resign without an explanation only days before the Apollo mission? You would think he would want to relish in the success. Doesn’t make sense.

Why did all three astronauts of Apollo 11 resign shortly after their return to earth? Don’t you think they would want to go again?

There are so many questions. So many inconsistences. Nothing makes sense. Nothing adds up.

Inconsistences:

Shadows

As someone with a photography degree, I know a little bit about light and shadows. These are shadows from two light sources. Look at the shadows. They would be on the same plane, parallel to each other and in the same direction if there were only one light source, as if from the sun. Where did the second light source come from?

Here is a photo of what shadows look like from a single light source, the sun. See the difference?

Photo by Hakan Arslan

According to the documentary, “A Funny Thing Happened on the way to the Moon,”

“From an analytical stand point, photographic anomalies have to be sought out with an understanding of lighting and shadows.”

So if Stanely Kubrick was such a brilliant filmmaker, why he did screw up the lighting? Did he think no one would notice?

Or did he have to use two light sources to get the shot? I know as a photographer, you always want to light your subject in the most effective manner possible to get the best results. Maybe if there was not a second light source, he would not be able to produce the image above. Maybe the second astronaut on the left would be too dark in the shadows. So maybe in his eyes, because he was hired to get the shot, he got the shot the best he could, and he needed to use two light sources to do it.

Radiation Belt

Ok now this is a biggie. So big the powers that be have no reasonable explantion. There is this thing called the Van Allen Radiation Belts. These lethal bands of radiation are located 25,000 miles away. According to NASA, the The Moon is an average of 238,855 miles away from Earth, which is about 30 Earths away.

So, we can assume if they really did go the moon, they would have to go thru the Van Allen Radiation Belts. In order to do so, they would need solid lead sheilding to protect the spaceship from burning up.

According to Science Direct, “ The plasmasphere contains two radiation belts, one below L=2 known as inner belt (proton belt) and the other above L=3, known as outer belt (electron belt). They are also called as Van Allen radiation belt (Van Allen and Frank, 1959). These radiation belts are regions of high energy protons and electrons encircling the Earth and trapped by geomagnetic fields.”

Did you catch that? The plasma field? Really? Plasma? They are saying we have plasma? I thought plasma did not exist. I thought only conspiracy theorists were the ones hammering on about plasma and getting free energy from the eather.

I digress.

From the documentary, “A Funny Thing Happened on the way to the Moon,”

“The mammouth Saturn 5 rocket used by Apollo was already 35 stories tall and weighed as much as a battleship. To add additional tonage in the form of a lead barrier completely surrounding the crew members would have made it imposible for the vehicle to get off the ground.”

They continued, “The Apollo space craft’s narrowest sheilding was less than 1/8 of an inch of light aluminum.”

I thought they needed lead for protection, and they used aluminum? Oh come on. Since when is aluminum as thick as lead?

According to our false narrative, as spewed out by propaganda fueled Chat GTP, “The Apollo missions were able to “penetrate” the Van Allen belts because they went through quickly, avoided the worst parts, and had enough shielding. The actual radiation doses were recorded and found to be well below dangerous levels.”

Give me a break. Again I ask, how stupid do they think we are?

Neil Armstrong and Body Language

What is up with this guy? When asked if saw stars while on the moon, he replied, “I don’t recall.” Another astronaut said he didn’t remember seeing any stars. Don’t you think they would have seen stars? Of course they would have.

It is speculated that no stars were photographed while they were on the moon because intelligent astronomers would be able to look at the constellations and be able to pinpoint a location. So in order to hide their location, they purposely omitted any photos of the stars.

Going back to Armstrong and the rest of the astronauts, thier behavior is not consistent with someone who has achieved the greatest acomplishment of all mankind. In videos they look down. They look depressed and despondent. Now I am no psychiatrist, but you can see it in their body language and facial expression.

Well well well, look what I found. An analysis of the astronauts body language by Dr. John Paul Garrison, a clinical forensic psychologist and body language expert. Talk about fascinating.

It turns out I was correct, their body language during the press conferences before and after the moon landing are not congruent with people who are happy or excited about their mission to the moon.

Here are some excepts from Dr. Garrison,"Now, if you look at his shoulders already, they’re very bunched up. So, he may be somebody that’s either uncomfortable speaking in front of others or he feels anxious right now. But this type of shoulder position we think of and we associate with discomfort and stress.

Now I want you to watch Buzz Aldrin who’s on the left. I want you to watch his mouth right here. So you see him licking his lips. Now this is something that Buzz Aldrin does quite a lot actually. But when you lick your lips, it’s a way to feel less stressed. It’s a way to calm yourself down. It’s a pacifying behavior. So why is it that right now as Neil Armstrong is talking about this? Why is that a time that Buzz Aldrin is trying to calm himself down? They’re all very still and the reason that being still matters is that we tend to associate stillness with trying to hide because there’s an instinctual part of us that when we feel threatened we believe if we sit still enough we can avoid that threat. So often times when people are being deceptive or they’re lying, they try to move less.”

He added, “But it does show that there is stress around this, that there is unusual body language that we’re seeing.”

Garrison also picks up that Armstrong is smirking, which is also another sign of deceptiveness. And he is compressing his lips, which he says is a sign of stress or concern.

He said, “And I think that that’s what people are keying in on and that’s what people are focusing on. They’re seeing that there is something that makes them feel unsettled when they watch this.”

Garrison also points out that Armstrong is leaning back in his chair. He said, “This is a way to gain emotional distance from the person we’re speaking to, whether it’s because it feels too intense or we’re trying to disengage in some way. It doesn’t mean to hide anything, but his way of interacting right now, there’s a lot going on under the surface right now.”

He also mentions that the astronauts are figeting with their pens. He said, “They’re having to do things to calm themselves down.”

What are they so nervous about? Where is all of this anxiety coming from?

He also said that Michael Collins has his chin tucked down, which indicates a defensive posture.

Garrison’s conclusion, “I do acknowledge that there was a lot of pacifying behavior that we saw. We saw what some people might associate with lying or deception. We saw people having to calm themselves down a lot. Now, there are multiple explanations for this potentially. They could be that they are uncomfortable because of being in front of all of these people.

It could be that they’re uncomfortable because they just went on a space trip because they were in quarantine for 21 days. There’s a variety of reasons why they could be stressed, but we do see distinct patterns of certain questions, particularly as it relates to memories of going into space. We do see more signs of pacification and more more of a need to calm themselves down at those times. So, I can actually see why people are skeptical and suspicious of this press conference or of both of these press conferences because their behavior does suggest a lot of stress and anxiety. And you would think for people that are astronauts that they would manage it a little bit differently.”

Here is a great compliation of Buzz Aldrin’s statements. Video title is incorrect.

If you don’t believe him, ask yourself why would he say those things?

Photos of the Moon

Here are the photos of the moon, as well as a place on earth. This scenery from a place on earth looks identical to the shot of the moon.

Check it out:

HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ARE!!!

A very interesting You Tube video by professional photographer Gary Fong posits that it was impossible to get the photos they claim were taken of the moon.

He states on his video’s description, “I had the unique opportunity to handle a de-commissioned Hasselblad lunar camera, leading to observations that raised questions in my mind. This video delves into the intriguing possibility that the photographs presented to the public as moon shots may not authentically depict the lunar landscape, based on the extensive information available to me.

It is important to clarify that I am not asserting a denial of the moon landing or endorsing any conspiracy theories, as I was not present during the events, nor do I personally know any of the astronauts. However, drawing on my extensive experience as a photographer using Hasselblad Cameras and operating a prominent photo lab, I find it challenging to believe that the moon photographs were captured on the lunar surface.”

He added, “Those photographs did not come from the moon. They absolutely did not come from the moon. If they did not come from the moon then where did they come from? A film set?”

One of the reasons why he thinks it was impossible is because of the great range of temperatures on the moon, based on what NASA reported. NASA states the daytime temperature of the moon is 250 degrees fahrenheit (boiling) and the nighttime temperatures is minus 208 degrees fahrenheit.

Once the slide film is exposed to high levels of heat, the film will expose or melt. The cameras they used were not insulated, with nothing to prevent dust from entering or to keep it a stable temperature. These dust spots would be highly visible on the photos, and they are absent.

“That film did not come from the moon.” Fong said.

Another issue is the camera batteries, which are only stable to 100 degrees. The batteries would have exploded at 250 degrees.

An interesting video comment, from Tommyalm2775 follows:

"The strongest evidence that the moon landing never took place is the high quality of the Hasselblad pictures. The camera that was said to have been brought had no working viewfinder, and no possibility to set distance and control focus. It was hardly possible to set aperture and shutter speed. And there was no exposure meter either.

The sharp, well-composed and perfectly exposed images shown are typical studio images. It must be remembered that the color films of that time had very little exposure tolerance. A maximum of half an aperture stop. And the 500EL camera itself was particularly unsuitable for such a mission. It has electric drive which was powered by the NickelCadium battery of the time. They can’t even handle -20 degrees.

Did you have a charger in the lunar lander? The film path in all Hasselblads is very cross, as the rollers sit behind the film plane. In addition, the current film is perforated for advance. It would be impossible to advance the film in the temperatures said to prevail on the moon. And there is a great risk that the emulation detaches from the base. And probably the film will be damaged by the cosmic radiation.”

If you are interested in seeing the complete analysis, here is the link:

Communication transmissions

These people have some explaining to do regarding this.

May be an image of 3 people, phone and text that says 'I CALLS THE MOON MOON239,000 239, 000 MILES AWAY REMOTE CONTROLS TOY 64.66 MILLION MILES AWAY CELL PHONE TOWER EVERY 3 MILES.. CAN'T GET SIGNAL'

Flag blowing

I thought the moon did not have an atmosphere. Where is the wind coming from?Look at this video of the flag blowing:

https://x.com/i/status/1805710634832519299

Oxygen

Stanley Kubrick

Well known for his film “2001: A Space Odyssey,” Kubrick was hired to create the biggest hoax of mankind. His special effects in the film were so believable, they thought he was the one that could make it look real.

What is extremely convincing and compelling to me is Kubrick’s confession before he died. Here are a few of his statements, “I perpetrated a huge fraud involving the United States government and NASA. The moon landings all were fake and I was the person who filmed it. I am dead serious. The conspiracy theorists are right on this occasion.”

When he was askeed why he was confessing, he said, “Don’t you think it’s important for people to know the truth? They’re already suspicious of the government they might as well have their suspicion confirmed.”

The interviewer asked Kubrick if he was allright, because he did not look well. Kubrick stated he was stressed and had been drinking a lot. He said he felt bad and felt proud at the same time. He was conflicted.

He said, “I made a film which I consider my masterpiece. I have to pay the consequences for the decision that I made many years ago to go along with this.”

Here is the link: https://x.com/i/status/1815322324176134398

Ok, so here we have it. He confessed. But why do people not believe him? Why would he lie?

Here is a good explanation about Kubrick from illuminaki on Twitter:

Stanley Kubrick and the Moon Landing: The Cinematic Illusion of the Century

…"Hidden Messages and Symbolism: Advocates of the theory scrutinize Kubrick’s later works, especially “The Shining,” for hidden confessions. They point to the Apollo 11 sweater worn by Danny, peculiar carpet patterns resembling the Apollo launch pad, and Room 237 (hinting at the moon’s approximate distance from Earth) as Kubrick’s veiled admissions of his involvement.

The Technical Feasibility: Kubrick’s expertise with front-screen projection, a technique he refined during “2001: A Space Odyssey,” is suggested as the key to faking the moon landing footage. Proponents argue that this method could create a convincing lunar landscape in a studio, a scenario less risky and controllable than an actual lunar mission.

The Cultural Impact and Legacy: The theory gained momentum in the years following the Apollo missions, fueling debates and documentaries. Kubrick’s death in 1999 only added layers to the conspiracy, with some claiming it was no coincidence, further shrouded by the mysterious nature of his final film, “Eyes Wide Shut.”

Why Kubrick? Why would Kubrick, at the height of his career, engage in such a deception? Theorists suggest it was the ultimate challenge for a filmmaker obsessed with detail and pioneering new frontiers in cinema. Or perhaps, it was a coerced decision – an offer he couldn’t refuse from the highest echelons of power. In this thrilling narrative, Stanley Kubrick wasn’t just a filmmaker but the mastermind behind one of the greatest deceptions in human history. Whether truth or fiction, the intertwining of Kubrick’s cinematic genius with the Apollo moon landing continues to fascinate, blurring the lines between reality and the magic of the movies.”

Gravity

How come the fruit is not floating?

Two min video showing how they fake gravity:

https://x.com/i/status/1819938042896921056

Here is another short video showing Hollywood tricks:

https://x.com/i/status/1792745222922973382

Link to video of a glass of water not floating in “space”

https://fb.watch/Cs4P3UlKlN/

Money

Yah, yah, we always know everything has something to do with money. The Apollo 11 mission cost taxpayers 135 billion dollars, 9 billion which went to contractors.

135 BILLION

Can you imagine how many people we could help with 135 billion dollars? How many people we could help house and feed?

But no, our stupid government thinks faking a mission to the moon is more important.

Does this vehicle look like it is of high quality? Why are they using lawn chairs? How much do you think they spent to make this?

I’ll tell you how much they spent:

Development + 4 rovers built: about $38 million (1970 dollars)
That’s roughly $10 million per rover at the time
In today’s money, about $70–80 million per rover

I’m sorry, but for 70 million, they could have done better.

HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ARE!

From Elon’s fragile ego@arthurapage on Twitter, “Who puts mud guards on a dust car? This is pre-lithuim so batteries are lead acid or ni-cd at best. Lawn chairs? This seems ‘proppy’ to me.”

Here is a comment posted on Facebook, by Tim Gillette:

“The comments are lacking a bit of intelligence. The idea that we haven’t been to the moon and aren’t going back is absurd. The number of people worldwide that would have to keep it a secret is “astronomical.”

As George Carlin said so well, “It’s a big club and you ain’t in it.”

People are good at keeping secrets if it means they will not be killed.

One last point I would like to make has to do with human psychology. Many people are trusting and believe what the media and other experts tell them. They saw it on tv so it must be true. For them to think the moon landing never happened, is a threat to their belief systems.

Op Freedom, a channel on Rumble, posted a video about the moon landing and had this to say, “If NASA was able to pull off such an outrageous hoax before the entire world and then keep that lie in place for four decades, what does that say about the control of information we receive?

He continued,… “What does it say about the very nature of the world we live in? This is what scares the hell out of people and prevents them from even considering the posibility that they could have been so throughly duped.”

Bravo. Well said.

Link to video: https://rumble.com/v20h2rq-the-moon-landing-hoax-by-taboo-conspiracy.html

In conclusion, I am not convinced they went to the moon. Just the fact that we are not able to penetrate the Van Allen radiation belts is really all I need to hear. But Kubrick’s confession really puts the final nail in the coffin.

As always I want to provide you with more information. I have put together some videos that are well worth your watch. Thanks so much for reading!

Woo hoo! Reached a milestone! 20 lies! Only 480 more to go!